Home
About Level3
Search archives
Issues
-Current Issue
- June 2010
- June 2009
- May 2008
- June 2007
- August 2006
- May 2005
- June 2004
- November 2003
DIT Home

Read postings about this article   |   Post a comment about this article  |  print this article [pdf]

HIGHER EDUCATION INTHE ECONOMIC CRISIS: RPL AS A TOOL FOR THE RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS, STUDENT MOBILITY, UP-SKILLING AND RE-SKILLING

Author - Kate Collins

 

[<<previous] [ next>>]


Show/ hide article menu (click icons opposite)
4.1 Data from Round One (cont)

The return on investment (ROI) from RPL to further and higher education was examined through thirteen statements, again to be rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Those statements with the highest levels of agreement are illustrated in table 2 below. Statements with a 100% rating for the ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’ answers were ‘RPL offers alternate pathways to qualification (mean of 4.5 and median 4.5), ‘RPL facilitates transfer into further and higher education’ (mean of 4.5 and median of 4.5), ‘RPL offers non-traditional learners the opportunity to participate in further and higher education’ (mean of 4.71 and median of 5), and ‘RPL policy should be mainstream in the higher education sector’ (mean of 4.67 and median of 5).(see Table 2).

The final section of the first round asked respondents to rate twenty-eight statements on the future of RPL on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The highest ranking statements to this question are given in Table 3 and included ‘RPL will only expand if there is mutual recognition of qualifications and awards’ (75%, mean 3.82 and median of 4=agree) and ‘the main driver of RPL will be individual qualifications’ (72.2%, mean of 4, median=4). An agreement level of 21.1% (mean of 2.86, median of 3=neither agree nor disagree) was found for ‘the main driver of RPL will be harmonisation of qualification systems’. Furthermore, the ‘main driver of RPL will be the globalisation of knowledge’ received only 22.3% (mean of 2.62, median of 2.5) of agreement by the panel and ‘UNESCO will be a main driver of a global model of RPL’ received the lowest levels of agreement of 15% (mean of 2.82, median of 3) despite globalisation being paramount to the expansion of lifelong learning in the literature.
(see Table 3).

 

[<<previous] [ next>>]



 

 
copyright   |   disclaimer   |   terms